Skip to main content

Argument analysis exercises

The exercise on this page gives you the chance to practise and sharpen your argument analysis skills.

In this article, note how the writer has structured the paragraphs by focusing on one key argument that has its claim as the topic sentence. Each argument is supported by evidence and the use of language to persuade the reader. There are also assumptions used to support the writer's argument and overall contention.

Practise argument analysis

Steps for analysing the argument:

1) Read the Mandatory Conscription: A necessity for national security.

2) Identify the contention, the arguments, the claims, the evidence and underlying assumptions as well as the use of language to persuade you as the reader.

3) Consider the quality of the overall argument in this text.

  • Think of what specific additional evidence might weaken or lend support to the claims.
  • Ask yourself what changes in the argument would make the reasoning more sound.
A stern military person.

Mandatory conscription:
A necessity for national security

By Major Kendra Horan

The reintroduction of mandatory conscription in Australia is a necessary step to bolster our national security and instil a sense of civic duty among young Australians. After all, what is more important than the safety of our families?

Critics, generally made up of people who have never served their country, argue that conscription is an outdated and coercive practice, but they overlook the significant benefits it can bring to both individuals and the nation. Countries with mandatory conscription have stronger, more resilient defence forces. By requiring all eligible young adults to serve, Australia would ensure a steady influx of trained personnel, ready to respond to any threats. Furthermore, conscription fosters discipline, teamwork, and a sense of responsibility, qualities that are invaluable in both military and civilian life.

Mandatory conscription can serve as a powerful equaliser in society, providing opportunities for personal growth and development that might otherwise be inaccessible. Research published in the Journal of Military and Strategic Studies indicates that conscription programmes often lead to increased social cohesion and a greater understanding of national values. A common consensus across a number of researchers suggests that young Australians from diverse backgrounds would come together, breaking down social barriers and building lasting bonds.

Critics who claim that conscription disrupts education and career plans fail to recognise the long-term advantages of the skills and experiences gained through military service. In fact, I would say that the vast majority of former conscripts would say that their time in the military was instrumental in shaping their future success.

Here are sample answers for the activity.

Contention

Countries with mandatory conscription have stronger, more resilient defence forces. By requiring all eligible young adults to serve, Australia would ensure a steady influx of trained personnel, ready to respond to any threats. Furthermore, conscription fosters discipline, teamwork, and a sense of responsibility, qualities that are invaluable in both military and civilian life.

Argument

Mandatory conscription can serve as a powerful equaliser in society, providing opportunities for personal growth and development that might otherwise be inaccessible.

Claim

The reintroduction of mandatory conscription in Australia is a necessary step to bolster our national security and instil a sense of civic duty among young Australians.

Evidence

Strong: Research published in the Journal of Military and Strategic Studies indicates that conscription programmes often lead to increased social cohesion and a greater understanding of national values.
Weak: A common consensus across a number of researchers suggests that young Australians from diverse backgrounds would come together, breaking down social barriers and building lasting bonds.

Assumption

  • Critics, generally made up of people who have never served their country, argue that conscription is an outdated and coercive practice, but they overlook the significant benefits it can bring to both individuals and the nation.
  • I would say that the vast majority of former conscripts would say that their time in the military was instrumental in shaping their future success.

Persuasive language

  • After all, what is more important than the safety of our families?
  • ...generally made up of people who have never served their country...
  • ...powerful equaliser...

Images on this page by RMIT, licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0